Ultrasonography of major salivary glands: a highly specific tool for distinguishing primary Sjögren's syndrome from undifferentiated connective tissue diseases.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, convincing data have been published on the value of salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) in differentiating primary SS from non-immune-mediated sicca syndrome. Limited data are available regarding the diagnostic accuracy of SGUS in distinguishing SS from other rheumatic diseases. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of SGUS in distinguishing patients with SS from those with xerostomia and/or xerophthalmia and a diagnosis of stable UCTD. METHODS: This cross-sectional study consecutively enrolled 150 patients either diagnosed with SS (as established by the American-European Consensus Group criteria) or affected by UCTD but not SS. Parotid and submandibular glands on both sides were assessed for size, parenchymal echogenicity and inhomogeneity by means of SGUS, which was performed by a radiologist blinded to the diagnosis. Echostructural alterations of the salivary glands were graded from 0 to 3 (cut-off >2). RESULTS: This study included 109 patients: 55 with SS and 54 with UCTD. Patients with SS showed a higher SGUS score in comparison with those with UCTD [mean 2.2 (s.d. 1.8) vs 0.2 (s.d. 0.5), P < 0.0001]. The SGUS cut-off >2 showed a sensitivity of 65%, a specificity of 96%, a positive predictive value of 95% and a negative predictive value of 73% for SS diagnosis. A significant correlation was also found between the SGUS score and the minor salivary gland biopsy/focus score (r = 0.484, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the good sensitivity and the high specificity of SGUS in differentiating SS from other CTDs.

In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome: A monocentric experience.

AIMS: (i) To analyze the in vivo corneal structure and sub-basal plexus nerves in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) and no-SS dry eye by confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM) and (ii) to correlate CSLM findings with tear function tests and with patients' subjective dryness. METHODS: Seventeen patients with pSS, 16 no-SS dry eye, and 20 healthy volunteers were included. CSLM parameters taken into consideration included: basal epithelial integrity, corneal thickness, epithelial cellular density, keratocyte activation, and sub-basal plexus morphology. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS-13 (Chicago IL, USA). RESULTS: CSLM pachymetric data and the superficial epithelium cell density were significantly lower in pSS versus no-SS dry eye (p < 0.0001); keratocyte activation and sub-basal nerve abnormalities were also more frequent in pSS patients (p < 0.0001). CSLM findings well correlated with both the ocular test results and the patients' perception of ocular dryness at the baseline and over the follow-up. CONCLUSION: CSLM might be a useful novel tool in the assessment of the involvement of the lachrymal functional unit in pSS.